- The Weekly D-Briefs
- Posts
- The Rise of “Third Culture” Brands
The Rise of “Third Culture” Brands
Built for a generation that finally stopped waiting for permission.
Lesson: The shift wasn’t diversity. It was visibility. People just stopped shrinking themselves to fit old categories.
For a long time, brands treated culture like a location. You were either building for “here” or “there.” Domestic or international. Traditional or modern. Pick a side and optimize for it. But that framework collapses the moment you realize entire generations aren’t living in a single lane anymore. They’re global in how they think, how they eat, how they work, how they spend. The world caught up to them, not the other way around. What’s changed isn’t taste. It’s posture. A growing group of consumers doesn’t want products that explain where they come from or ask them to choose how they identify. They want things that fit without friction. Things that don’t require a backstory to feel right. That’s where third-culture brands are quietly winning. Not because they’re louder. Not because they’re trendier. But because they’re designed from lived reality instead of market theory. These brands aren’t translating culture from one place to another. They’re building from the way people actually move through their day.
You see it in small, telling moments. Someone who values heritage but expects modern quality. Someone who’s fluent in multiple worlds and impatient with products that feel stuck in one. Someone who doesn’t want to perform identity, but still wants it present. When brands miss this, it’s usually because they treat culture like an aesthetic. They overdo the symbols. They lean too hard into nostalgia. Or they try to ride a trend instead of owning the truth. It becomes performative, a costume instead of a point of view. What works is restraint. Confidence. An understanding that you don’t need to explain yourself to the people you’re building for. You just need to show up correctly.
That became obvious when I started building Jivati. Indian food was already everywhere. That part of the world didn’t need convincing. But beverages told a different story. The aisle was full, but empty at the same time. Everything looked familiar to someone, just not to us. The flavors we knew. The balance we valued. The worldview we carried. None of it made its way onto the shelf. It wasn’t about representation. It was about accuracy. I didn’t build Jivati to modernize tradition or sanitize culture. I built it because I kept seeing a gap between how we live and what we’re offered. And once you see a gap that clearly, it’s impossible to unsee it. You either ignore it like everyone else, or you build the thing you know should already exist.
That’s the pattern behind the third-culture brands that last. They don’t chase scale first. They earn trust first. They don’t try to represent everyone. They stay precise. And because of that, they travel further than brands built on broad appeal ever do. This isn’t limited to food or beverages. You see it in fashion, music, design, anywhere people are tired of choosing between old and new, tradition and convenience, home and the world. The brands that understand this moment don’t treat it like a balancing act. They build from a place that feels natural to them, and let the rest follow.
What makes this moment different is who’s building. This new wave of founders isn’t trying to get approval from legacy categories. They’re creating products based on lived experience, not industry templates. And because they’re building from instinct, not imitation, their work hits with a clarity you can’t manufacture.
Closing Thought
Third-culture brands don’t win by declaring who they represent. They win when people feel seen without needing the explanation. It’s not about blending worlds. It’s about finally building for the world you already live in.
Stick around. I’m just warming up.
Subscribe here for more → The Weekly D-Briefs (or forward this to someone building something meaningful)
