- The Weekly D-Briefs
- Posts
- The Oatly Problem
The Oatly Problem
The brand that made oat milk feel cool.

Lesson: When the front of the package makes a promise, the back has to keep it.
Oatly didn’t blow up because it tasted good. Plenty of things taste good. It blew up because it made people feel like they were making a better choice. That was the unlock. You weren’t buying milk. You were buying a mood: cleaner, kinder, modern, conscious. I noticed Oatly the way most people did, online first, then in stores, then in cafés. The carton stood out immediately. It didn’t look like milk. It didn’t look like a health drink. It looked like someone was finally having fun in a category that hadn’t evolved since the plastic jug. It tasted good, too. Creamy. Smooth. Better than almond milk. And you didn’t have to think about cows or cholesterol. So at first glance, it felt like the obvious upgrade.
But flip the carton and the mood shifts. Oat milk isn’t just oats and water. It’s enzymes, oils, stabilizers, and processing choices that don’t fully match the stripped-down, conversational vibe on the front. Not a scandal. just a mismatch between expectation and what’s actually inside. In categories built on trust, that mismatch becomes the lane competitors move into.
Oatly still deserves credit for helping plant-based milk break into the mainstream, even as the landscape shifted around it. The global oat-milk market continues to expand, growing from $3.46 billion in 2024 to $3.84 billion in 2025, and projected to reach $5.67 billion by 2030, according to The Business Research Company’s latest market report. That momentum wasn’t manufactured; it reflected real demand. But as the category matured and consumers started reading labels as closely as branding, newer players leaned into simpler formulations, shorter ingredient lists, and quieter positioning. Once shoppers began comparing the back of the carton, not just the front, the competitive edge shifted. Oatly didn’t fall behind; the rest of the category simply caught up.
Where the Real Edge Lives
Once oat milk became a real category, the advantage shifted away from branding entirely. The brands that kept climbing were the ones that could hit consistent texture, predictable performance in cafés, and stable cost structures at scale. That’s the part most people don’t see: baristas drove half this category’s momentum, and the products that foamed reliably, blended cleanly, and held up in heat kept their shelf space longest. As the market grew, retailers stopped rewarding personality and started rewarding products that behaved the same way in every use-case.
Three Signals That Matter
Signal 1 - Founder/Operator Takeaway
When your brand talks louder than your product, the gap becomes your competitor’s entry point. Oatly created the cultural moment, but cleaner brands captured the credibility.
Signal 2 - Consumer Insight
Shoppers today aren’t chasing “plant-based”; they’re chasing proof. The second purchase happens when the story matches the label without needing footnotes.
Signal 3 - Investor/Market Lens
In alt-dairy, the real advantage now sits with brands that run tight formulation, sourcing, and COGS. The hype wave opens the category, and operational discipline wins the long game.
That’s my read on it from actually building in the CPG space.
Stick around. I’m just warming up.
Subscribe here for more → The Weekly D-Briefs (or forward this to someone building something meaningful)
